Spike: The Classic Existentialist Hero (or alternatively Angel: the limpdick determinist who sports Nancy Boy Hair Gel)

 

WARNING: philosophical discourse ahead...

 

1.        Free Will and Existentialism

 

“Existence precedes essence”

- Jean-Paul Sartre

 

Firstly, for those unfamiliar with the term, existentialism is a philosophy concerned with the nature and meaning of human existence, more specifically the condition and existence of man, his place and function in the universe and his relationship (or lack thereof) with God.  It emphasizes the creative role of the individual in forging their own destiny, fashioning their own purpose, thus the individual (free of any external aids whatsoever) must accept complete responsibility for his/her own actions. 

                I’ll start by explaining Sartre’s famous phrase which I’ve quoted above (it basically sums up what existentialism is all about), what the Frenchie is saying is that each individual human being is a free and active agent born without a fixed ‘essence’ (i.e. purpose, destiny, fate – all bollocks) which he must fulfill (contrast this to Aquinas and Natural Law as well as Aristotle and final causes), rather individuals in what they do and the choices they make, have the power to shape their own lives.  In short, go your own way, you and you alone are responsible for shaping your destiny and finding your purpose in life simply through the choices you make from day to day.  Each individual, by the choice of what he does or does not do, gives essence to their existence and selects their own destiny.  Life is a challenge and a project, the existential task is to develop and take in new experiences, and in the process find one’s own essence.  This modern vision of existentialism is atheistic by nature as God (a purposeful Creator) would presuppose that essence precedes existence and thus would mean that each individual agent is not free to forge their own destiny through the choices they make as their destiny has already being determined by the Almighty.  In short, no God folks.  

                Now, before I relate this back to Spike (and if you haven’t worked it out by now I suggest you stop reading) I’ll touch briefly on Heidegger and Kierkegaard (the guy credited with founding existentialism).  Kierkegaard was a very devout Christian who saw the relationship between the individual and God as paramount.  He insisted that God had given people complete freedom to make their own decisions.  Kierkegaard being the perceptive and intelligent bloke that he was recognized that this was not only a new way of looking at man’s position and function in the universe – but a FUCKING TERRIFYING  way of looking at man’s position and function in the universe.  In a time of tremendous respect for authority (both moral and heavenly) and the rigid application of societal norms and conventions, Kierkegaard was saying no one could escape from their freedom of choice which represented an act of faith, a leap in the dark as there were no guarantees, no easy way out, one could no longer just stay on the straight and narrow path dictated by society and organised religion and then claim to have acted morally and demand entrance into heaven.  Kierkegaard regarded those (e.g. Hegel) who formed abstract schemes of thought in order to comprehend (simply) life and give to every tiny action some place in a purposeful overall pattern, as escapists. 

Insert Rant: See Season Two of Angel when the Dickless Coward Whose Name Will Not Be Uttered went AWOL after coming to this precise realisation – faced with the apparent meaningless of events on a cosmic scale the Broodmeister lost all hope and went on a killing spree (standard response of the weak willed and cowardly).  Just what has the mentally defective moron being reading for the past two centuries?  Nora Roberts? I mean they show him reading French literature but they just skipped over that little period in the 20th Century featuring Sartre and Camus? Actually in all likelihood The Poof probably did read them – just too thick to learn anything.  Alternatively he was too busy rotting in some filthy gutter with his precious soul and/or condemning a hotel full of people to almost certain death at the hands of maniacal demon in LA.  Yes, gotta love that “Noble, Self-Sacrificing Hero”™ that is Angel. 

Angel fits the definition of a cowardly escapist perfectly, he clings desperately to outdated and discredited notions like destiny and fate, he regards himself as fortune’s knave, the servant of the All-Wise, All-Powerful and All-Good Powers That Be who have even gone to the trouble of writing him his very own prophecy.  As a card-carrying existentialist let me tell you this: the prophecy, the supposed instrument of his salvation is the very thing which ensures Angel will never ever be truly human.  Human beings do not have the luxury of what essentially amounts to a binding contract: stay on the straight and narrow you Braindead Fuckwit and you shall have the ultimate reward.  Life doesn’t work like that folks, not for us, we have no guarantees, no external aids or props in the form of the PTB instead we, as free and active agents are fully responsible for shaping our own lives (except for Communists and Socialists) and until Angel learns to do the same without the aid of a “Get Out Of Jail Free” Card every time he screws up (e.g. boning a 17 year old schoolgirl, killing a cellar full of humans), until he faces what Kurtz called “the horror” in Heart of Darkness, until he knows what it is like to live from day to day having to face the terrifying thought that he and he alone must take responsibility for his choices and for forging his own existence, then Angel can never know what it is like to be a human and consequently can never be human.

In short, Angel is a determinist, he rejects free will and he believes that every event happens for a purpose (his turning, the Gypsy curse etc.) directed by the PTB towards some ‘final good’.  He believes that essence precedes existence, that he has a divine purpose (to help the helpless) and is destined to receive a fitting reward (Shanshu – humanity).  If you believe that rot, then reader you belong in an asylum for the intellectually poverty stricken.  Fate, Destiny, Fortune and Prophecy are but escapist fantasies for the cowardly and weak willed who lack the courage and fortitude to just live from day to day simply making the choices which determine their essence.

 

2.        Spike

If, reader you possess anything resembling an intellect you will realise where I’m going with this.  Spike embodies the existentialist precepts I have outlined above.  Let’s move in chronological order, starting with Spike’s turning in 1880.  Spike tells Buffy in Fool For Love, that he was “tired of living by society’s rules...decided to make a few of my own.”  Spike’s conscious rejection of societal norms and conventions corresponds precisely to what Heidegger was saying that in order to live “an authentic existence”, one must escape the expectations of others by refusing to meekly accept the roles (and values) that society allocates.  In short, don’t merely conform to society’s expectations, exercise your free will and be your own man (or woman or vampire...).  Initially as a creature with no conscience naturally orientated towards evil Spike ‘breaks the mould’ so to speak by rejecting Angel’s (the gang leader, the experienced “Yoda”) advice.  Spike is from his birth as a vamp, a Rebel Without A Cause, reckless and impetuous he seems to be seeking, grasping at something just beyond his reach. 

He rejects Angel’s advice about the “artistry” of “a clean kill, a good kill” (i.e. psychological torture of victims must come before the actual killing) and risks the safety of the entire gang by going with his “fist and fangs” approach.  He asks Angel pointedly, “Don’t you ever get tired of fights you know you’re gonna win?”  Angel is the absolute apotheosis of an evil vampire, he embodies what all vamps aspire to, a cunning demon utterly devoid of humanity who revels in the suffering of all that is clean, pure and good (Exhibit A: Druscilla).  Although a mere fledgling, Spike is already rejecting Angel’s advice and choosing his own (far riskier) path.  Admittedly, Spike is not striving towards anything particular noble at this stage, as he aims to achieve status and prestige with the demon underworld, but he is already shaping his own individual destiny, free of any external aids and constraints.  The path Spike has chosen is one fraught with danger, in order to attain power and respect within (demon) society he will confront the latest in a long line of mystical warriors whose sole design is to kill his kind – unarmed in one-to-one combat.  It is most definitely not the quick and easy path.  In a supreme act of will (and a fair dose of luck) Spike does the unthinkable, he confronts and kills two Slayers and in the process attains his goal: tremendous power, respect and authority within the demon world. 

Spike like any good existentialist clearly regards life as a challenge and a project, that’s precisely the reason he heads for Sunnydale in 1998 to confront the latest Slayer (and of course to cure his injured lover – a decidedly undemonlike thing to do especially when you consider the way Darla treated Angel, leaving him for dead in a barn and the way Dru treated Spike when he was in the wheelchair).  Although he himself is unaware of it, this essentially marks the end of the path he has been following for 120 years, he will soon voluntarily choose to embark on an entirely new path which will reshape his existence. 

We are immediately presented with clear and unambiguous evidence of Spike’s (unconscious or otherwise) existentialist inclinations – he rejects the vampire religious ceremonies (and indeed vamp religion in general) and hastily kills the one vampire (The Anointed One) which prophecy has foretold will lead them to victory.  It is nothing less than a supreme rejection of authority and the conventions of the society which he inhabits.  Spike is cast clearly as a free agent who rejects the idea of determinism, destiny, fortune etc. from the outset.  Spike has zero respect for convention and prophecy, which is the hallmark of an existentialist hero.  However it is true that Spike also proclaims that he is a demon and “demons don’t change”, a sign that whilst Spike is already on the existential path, he is yet to fully embrace the existentialist life as he regards some choices (i.e. being a White Hat) as closed where as a fully committed existentialist (which he essentially becomes in Season Five) would do no such thing. 

Spike does his utmost to kill the latest Slayer but fails for a variety of reasons (plain bad luck, skill of the opponent etc.).  It is important to note not just what The Judge tells Spike and Dru (that they “reek of humanity” because of the affection they share for one another) but Spike’s reaction to it, he is incensed and immediately reminds The Judge who’s in charge, the opinion of his fellow demons means little to Spike, he doesn’t mind reeking of humanity (its his choice after all) and above all he remains faithful to himself and makes it clear that he will do as he sees fit.  Also note Angel’s complete lack of humanity sans soul and the way his relationship with Darla was characterized in flashbacks (on Angel) – clearly not genuine human emotions.

After Buffy drops a church organ on him thus rendering him temporarily paraplegic and confined to a wheelchair, Spike is plunged into an existentialist crisis.  Angel has taken his lover, his power, authority and leadership, all the things Spike values are rapidly slipping from his grasp (and Angel, bless his petty vindictive heart is more than willing to remind Spike of it).  Spike is now in a dilemma but like any good existentialist, he never shirks from the choice he has to make (no matter how unpalatable it may seem), he reasserts control over his own destiny by choosing once again to ‘break the mould’, screw convention and do exactly what (demon) society prohibits him from doing – cutting a pragmatic deal (and that’s all it is at first) with his mortal enemy – the Slayer.  Spike is once again following Heidegger’s advice by refusing to meekly accept the role allocated to him by society and in the process make the necessary choice to reclaim what is he believes to be his existence. 

However, Spike is also developing a certain amount of respect for the Slayer, a respect which he seems to have had for all his adversaries, unlike Angel, Spike does not go after the Slayer’s friends and family (even though there is no doubt the he could if he actually wanted to murder Xander, Willow or Joyce at nearly any stage in Season Two).  Spike leaves the family out of it and this makes his brand of evil much more tolerable than Angel’s (but make no mistake Spike was a monster – he would eat you or I in heartbeat if he were feeling peckish during Season Two). He doesn’t even hold a grudge against Joyce for braining him with a fire axe during their first meeting (and foiling his plan to slay the Slayer), rather he holds a certain amount of respect for a parent who cares so much for their child.  Strictly speaking, as a demon Spike should not even be having these thoughts for human beings, they are after all no more than “happy meals with legs.”  Perhaps the biggest clue as to Spike’s emotions are his final words in Season Two, “Bloody hell...he’s gonna kill her” as he is about to turn to leave Sunnydale.  A strange thing for a demon whose purpose is to kill the Slayer to say, Spike is already unsure as to whether he actually wants his mortal enemy to die!  Of course, he shakes his head as if to clear these treacherous thoughts from his mind and abandons her to her death but even an existentialist hero with a will as formidable as Spike’s could not make such a radical, life altering choice (saving his mortal enemy when his own self-interest is not at stake) at such an early stage (after knowing her for just a year).

When Spike returns in Lover’s Walk, we see first hand that the “humanity” (which Spike voluntarily cultivated through his relationship with Dru) which The Judge spoke of is alive and well.   The poor bloke is heartbroken when his lover terminates their century old relationship for reasons not fully explained until Season Five.  Spike has always, even as a monster, chosen to open himself to love, something which other vampires do not (note the cleansing rituals The Annoying One makes his minions perform).  During Lover’s Walk, Joss Wheadon (intentionally or otherwise) makes what is perhaps the most overt reference yet to Spike’s existentialist inclinations. When Buffy pins him to kitchen bench, holds him at stake point and tells him pointedly that he shouldn’t have come back, Spike replies evenly, “I do as I please.”  This is the classic existentialist’s response, that no matter what society expects of us, the individual is free to do as he or she likes and must make their own choices thereby fashioning their own existence.  Spike as usual is supplying anyone who asks with the stainless truth, he is his own man and will determine his own choices free of external interference.

Now we move onto Season Four. Whilst James Marsters was terrific in the Harsh Light of Day and the Angel episode featuring his famous monologue and most agree that his intervention rescued what was to that point a very ordinary season simply through his presence and charisma, Spike really does very little for the rest of Season Four.  He only goes to the Scoobies for help because he believes the US Government’s chip prevents him from harming anything, demon or human.  Yes he later chooses to help them but the rationale the writers supply us for him doing so is murky at best.  During the latter part of Season Four I was deeply puzzled as to why when he discovered he could pummel non-humans Spike didn’t simply reclaim (or at least try to reclaim) his former position within demon society rather than act as a paid mercenary for people he claimed to hate and suffer beatings at the hands of his fellow demons as a result. It really came as no surprise when he betrayed the Scoobies to Adam, but I was even more surprised that Spike didn't do something similar earlier, after all he kept reiterating he hated the Scoobies. Of course, Spike's murky motivations were only properly addressed in Season Five, which vies with Season Two for the title as the Year of Spike.

Spike comes to the realization (due admittedly in part to the chip which was implanted against his will) that he has fallen in love with that which he should most hate, the Slayer.  However, how he acts and the choices he makes subsequent to this discovery are all an exercise of free will.  Spike remains in complete control of his own actions and the choices he makes are entirely his own.  Spike (not the chip which only makes him passively evil, not actively good) chooses to stay in town and explore these new found feelings.  It is completely within his power to skip town and journey to the opposite end of the earth where he could (as he demonstrated so clearly in Season Two) seize control of the demon underworld in an entirely different city where no one has heard of his weakness and treachery.  But that would be the coward’s response and Spike like any true existentialist chooses to face his feelings and thus enrich his own existence.

The second major decision which Spike makes is that he no longer wants the Slayer dead and thus he chooses to help her, the chip does not compel him to do so, his long since dead soul does not compel him to do so, it is just Spike, a vampire yes but a free and active agent like you or I who chooses to save the life of his mortal enemy.  When Harm informs him that an attempt will be made on the Slayer’s life he immediately rushes off to help. Now, in all likelihood Buffy would’ve beaten the demons off anyway but Spike has already begun to turn his back on demon society and his former way of life.  Fool For Love is the episode which demonstrated to doubters everywhere (myself included because at this stage I honestly had no idea how genuine the writers wanted to make Spike’s feelings) that Spike made the monumental choice to turn his back on the life which he had successfully crafted for himself, to turn his back on the one feat which gave him fame and power (i.e. killing Slayers), to shatter completely and once and for all the chains of societal conventions and to crush beneath the weight of his formidable will the role allotted to him by his native (demon) society.  I am speaking of course of the famous last scene where Spike is presented with what he once craved above all else, another opportunity to bag a Slayer, a means to further his status within demon society (this is the path which Spike had previously chosen for himself) but Spike chooses not to kill his mortal enemy when she is at her most vulnerable.  Spike has made the most terrifying choice imaginable, he is voluntarily throwing away 120 years of existence, an existence which he freely choose, an existence which he once classified as happiness – all for a girl whom he repeatedly acknowledges will “never” love him back.

Most importantly of all Spike made that choice completely on his own, he and he alone is responsible for his own actions, there are no external aids assisting him in any way, shape or form.  Remember, the chip is a restraining device, it made him passively evil in Season Four but it is not a device which forces its wearer to be actively good.  This is very important for Spike to be classified as an “existentialist hero” as it demonstrates that all of Spike’s actions in Season Five are an exercise of free will by an individual free agent.

 

3. Angel

Now, contrast this to Angel’s supposed heroic journey of redemption (which as an existentialist I detest – Angel embodies the definitive anti-existentialist life).  Firstly, we have the question of choice, did Angel ever made the active choice to be good of his own free will without external aids?  Short answer: no.  Ergo Angel is not a hero in my mind.  Let’s start at the beginning, Angel’s turning, Darla found him drunk in a dark alley on the way home to steal money from his father (whom he had treated with undeserved contempt) to spend on prostitutes (he tells the owners of the fine establishment to keep the girls “warm”).  Add to this the strong implication that he had raped or at the very least forced himself on one of his family’s servants (reason for his father ejecting him) and you have the sort of man who represents the absolute detritus of human society – driven entirely by his basest urges and lacking anything resembling self-restraint.  It is no surprise then that he makes a fine vampire – immoral, cold and inhuman a creature whose first order of business is to eviscerate his own flesh and blood. 

The soul is what you call a form of external interference – it is forced upon him by the mysterious Powers That Be (i.e. Fate, Destiny, Fortune). Angel at no stage made the conscious choice to actually be good, as a human he was an arseclown, as a vamp he was just pure evil and as a vampire with a soul he was a mess, an aimless vagrant with no will to shape his own life, too weak to make the conscious choice to be a hero.  Even with the extensive aid of external powers who have provided him with a conscience he remains unable to accept responsibility for his own existence by choosing to do good.  And seriously folks, what kind of decent, compassionate human being does NOT want to do good after committing the kind of sins Angel has?  Well, it seems Angel (soul or no soul) is neither decent nor compassionate because his first reaction was to rejoin Darla and his second to spend about a century rotting in filthy gutters alienating himself from the very people the PTB want him to help (or alternatively as I mentioned earlier condemning an entire hotel full of people to near certain death at the hands of a maniacal demon).

Once again, Angel proves incapable of forging his own destiny and requires external aid in the form of an immortal demon, a messenger from the PTB named Whistler in 1996 (oh yeah and the sight of a scorching hot blonde 16 year old schoolgirl) to finally convince him that to do good isn’t such a bad idea.  But sadly it is not Angel’s own choice to be good, it is largely the work of the PTB not Angel’s own will thus making his actions rather worthless from an existentialist viewpoint.  He is a passive rather than an active agent in the existentialist mould.  Now, in addition to the not insubstantial assistance lent to him by the PTB Angel also has the love and devotion of an incredibly beautiful, incredibly courageous girl to spur him on to do good works but still – he struggles.  In Prophecy Girl Xander has to literally drag him down into the caves to help save Buffy (my two cents: Angel couldn’t be bothered because in his mind Prophecy and Fate mean more than the power of the human will – which do you reckon to be the better bet? I know which I’d choose....)

It is Xander who demonstrates the strength of his will, he is able to make the choice to risk his life (no superpowers remember) for a girl who has just dealt him a cruel blow, rejecting him for a creepy stranger she hardly knew whereas Angel who has the added incentive of Buffy love is rendered immobile.

Angel’s next big mistake comes when he bones a 17 year old schoolgirl and loses his soul as a result.  Not only is that immoral, I’m fairly certain its illegal in several states but as per usual he is handed a “Get Out Of Jail Free” card by the PTB (rescued from Hell).  Once again Angel is the beneficiary of external aid.

The series premiere of Angel is a clear reminder of just how little Angel has come in the past century (even with all the help from the PTB, Buffy and the soul) and just how lost Angel is without external aid.  Angel needs another messenger from the PTB (Doyle) to put him back on the straight and narrow, to tell him that in order to reclaim his humanity he needs to actually empathize and connect with the people he saves.   

Rant: This is really getting to be tiresome (listing all the times the Limpdick Determinist has needed external aid is a time-consuming task folks).  OK, nearly there.

Season Two is when Angel reminded us all just what a weak and spineless creature he really was. After being given the binding contract which I spoke of earlier in the Season One finale, Angel simply manages to contrive a way to bugger things up royally.  (Refer back to earlier rant for the full explanation).  Now, this is when the PTB lose all credibility, using their latest messenger (Lorne), they absolve Angel arbitrarily and completely of the murder of a cellar full of lawyers (admittedly unpleasant folk but people with souls nonetheless) when in possession of his soul.  Rather than taking responsibility for his own choices (the existentialist response) Angel happily accepts this form of pseudo-atonement for his sins being the intellectually bankrupt prick that he is.  It is only later in Season Two when Angel finally has his epiphany and adopts something resembling the existentialist philosophy which he needs to attain atonement (after a century of extensive help from others), the very same philosophy Spike has been unconsciously adhering to after just two years (without extensive help from others).  Essentially Angel realizes that there is no cosmic order and purpose, no balance sheet where he can measure his progress towards redemption, the only thing which he can do is to make the best possible choices from day to day – for that is the path towards genuine redemption.  

 

3.        A note on syllogisms and abuse by Evilistas (just had to jot this down before I forgot...sorry J)

 

A syllogism is a simple form of argument commonly used in philosophy.  Here’s the basic structure:

1.        All X’s are Y’s

2.        “B” is a X

3.        Therefore “B” is a Y

 

And here’s an example:

1.        All men are mortal

2.        Socrates is a man

3.        Therefore Socrates is mortal

 

And here’s the “syllogism” being used by evilistas to argue against Spike’s heroism and ability to attain some form of atonement (but never complete redemption) for his sins:

1.        All soulless demons are evil

2.        Spike is a soulless demon

3.        Therefore Spike is evil

 

Here’s the problem folks, in order for a syllogism to work, the first stage (all X’s are Y’s) must be proven to be true without exception.  Fortunately for Spike, (and this is somewhat ironic), events which have transpired on Angel have proven otherwise.  The two most pertinent cases are the “violent” Pakistani demon which Angel went and killed without a second thought in the Season Two opener (but turned out to be good – the demon had chosen to act as a guardian for a pregnant woman) and Angel’s own actions in the episode where Doyle dies.  Angel is ready to die to save an entire boatload of soulless demons – I doubt he would do so if he believed them to be evil!

 

4.  Ethics

I want to approach this from a Kantian perspective, Immanuel Kant placed the ‘good will’ at the very centre of his ethics.  He drew a clear distinction between the hypothetical and the categorical imperative.  A categorical imperative is simply: Do X (without thought to anticipated results) whilst a hypothetical imperative is: If X then do Y.  He saw nothing moral in a hypothetical imperative as one is simply following a sequence of actions in order to achieve a result which you selfishly desire.  Moral choice therefore implied a categorical imperative.  The mechanism which Kant devised to determine categorical imperatives was universalisation i.e. something is right and should be made a categorical imperative if you are content for it to be made universal law.

Angel is clearly acting on a hypothetical imperative (if you want to become human then you have to do good) therefore as I mentioned earlier the prophecies devoted to The Vampire With A Soul and Shanshu in particular actually hinder rather aid his redemption as they prevent him from acting morally (as he is thinking in terms of anticipated rewards).

Contrast this to Spike, no prophecy, no promise of humanity and until very recently no hope that the woman he loved would ever love him back but in the space of two years he has achieved as much (or even more) than Angel has done in a century of brooding and sulking.  For Spike there are no rewards and according to Kant, that makes Spike the distinct moral superior.

Also think about this, a basic principle in philosophy is that a person who does something with more constraints has achieved more than a person doing the identical thing with less constraints (e.g. if a one armed man beat Pete Sampras in a tennis match it would be considered a greater achievement than if a two armed man did likewise).  Angel has had far less constraints and more assistance than Spike, whilst Spike has no soul, no special relationship with the PTB, is never mentioned in prophecy and was cruelly rejected by the woman he loved, Angel has all of these things, a soul, the PTB adore him, he has a starring role in prophecies and Buffy returned his affections almost immediately.  So, just like the one-armed tennis player, Spike is the clear victor as he has completed the task with more constraints than his opponent.

 

 

 

Demarcation